data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d47ca/d47ca28833a941e1ba7c8dc7d5be917b1e4f56a7" alt=""
That's all speculation. I'm more concerned with the name and logo and what they represent for Jugs and Mugs in concert with the type of restaurant the chef and general manager, Chick Hawksley, is going for. In the Table Hopping piece, Hawksley says, "This is not a college bar; things are not going to suddenly go crazy at 9 p.m." Barnes goes on to say that the restaurant expects to feature compelling food--the kind that I say is missing from most pubs and casual restaurants in the Capital Region (in favor of unimaginative Sysco stylings)--including New Orleans shrimp, pork belly and manchego tacos, fried chicken, house-made corned beef. None of it will be frozen, and the shot of chicken wings included in the article makes the food look promising.
So what's the problem? I say this as a non-prude, someone who doesn't care that places like Hooters--or even Nite Moves--exist and are popular. I may not frequent such places, but unless a place is bringing real problems to an area, I don't see a reason for the government to step in and stop it from opening or shut it down. The problem is that the name and logo for Jugs and Mugs don't seem to jibe with the type of restaurant Hawksley is going for. In one fell swoop, the restaurant has effectively eliminated a significant portion of their potential clientele. And that just seems like bad business to me.